I recently saw an interview with Lloyd Blankfein from Goldman Sachs opining on the need for America to
rein in entitlement spending. Of course
I would have appreciated the interview more if it had taken place where it
should have, with him behind bars. Our
countries financial crisis has been beautifully covered by Matt Taibbi in
Rolling Stone, his latest “Secrets and Lies of the Bailout” is a wonderful look
at consequences of the “bailout” http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/secret-and-lies-of-the-bailout-20130104);
We were told that the taxpayer was stepping
in – only temporarily, mind you – to prop up the economy and save the world
from financial catastrophe. What we actually ended up doing was the exact
opposite: committing American taxpayers to permanent, blind support of an
ungovernable, unregulatable, hyperconcentrated new financial system that
exacerbates the greed and inequality that caused the crash, and forces Wall
Street banks like Goldman Sachs and Citigroup to increase risk rather than
reduce it. The result is one of those deals where one wrong decision early on
blossoms into a lush nightmare of unintended consequences. We thought we were
just letting a friend crash at the house for a few days; we ended up with a
family of hillbillies who moved in forever, sleeping nine to a bed and building
a meth lab on the front lawn.
Out of the initial bailouts we have
moved to “Wall Street Reform,” i.e. - permanent government support to the big
banks, and this has skewed the markets in favor of the big banks (crony
capitalism at its worst);
The first independent study that attempted to
put a numerical value on the Implicit (government) Guarantee popped up about a
year after the crash, in September 2009, when Dean Baker and Travis McArthur of
the Center for Economic and Policy Research published a paper called "The
Value of the 'Too Big to Fail' Big Bank Subsidy." Baker and McArthur found
that prior to the last quarter of 2007, just before the start of the crisis,
financial firms with $100 billion or more in assets were paying on average
about 0.29 percent less to borrow money than smaller firms.
Apparently the government support
that is good for Mr. Blankfein and his merry band of criminals at Goldman Sachs
and on Wall Street, but it is NOT good for working Americans who might actually
need entitlements such as Social Security and Medicare to live on.
No comments:
Post a Comment